Historical stall-position analysis for five-furlong handicaps at Sandown, with separate markers for faster and softer going.

Sandown 5f Draw Bias

Best place to be drawnNo strong overall bias
Race type3yo+ handicaps
Sample period2015–2025
Key influenceSoft ground

What the pattern suggests

The sample does not support the idea of a permanent, overwhelming low-draw advantage. Results vary from meeting to meeting, but lower-numbered stalls appear to become more useful when the ground is soft.

How to read the chart

Each mark represents a winning stall number plotted against the total number of runners. This reveals whether winners repeatedly cluster towards the low, middle or high side.

Good or fasterGood to soft or softer

The source chart covers horses aged three and older in handicaps from 2015–2025.

Stall-numbering note: From 30 March 2011, stall numbering on right-handed courses changed so that stall 1 is always on the inside. Earlier Sandown results in the chart have been converted to the modern numbering convention.

Historical winning-stall chart

WINNING STALL NUMBER



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
No

of

R

U

N

N

E

R

S

8  11   11  1 1  1
1











9 11111
1   1111  1
   1 11




3yr olds and older
H'caps Only
2015 - 2025


10  11    1 1  1  111 111  111





11  1111    111
  1  
 
 




12  111 11  1 11 11  
1 1

1







13  11
11    1
  1    1
    1







14      1      
 
     1
1





15  1  1

1
               1





16       
         

         1



17                    
       
 1


18                  
   
 
 



19                      

     
   
20      
1  
     


 
 





15 6 6 5 2 0
<--Good or better -->
4 4 2 3 6 9



34

28

How to use the bias

  • Pace: identify where the likely early leaders are drawn and which runners can secure a good position.
  • Going: consider whether the inside or outside is riding faster on the day.
  • Field size: draw effects are often more meaningful when runners are crowded into larger fields.
  • Recent evidence: rail movements, watering and weather can alter the effective bias.

Conclusion

Sandown’s five furlongs are run on a separate uphill track through the centre of the course. Although the course has long had a reputation for favouring low numbers, the historical chart suggests the effect is not consistent at every meeting. The clearest practical angle is to give extra consideration to lower stalls when conditions are soft, while still checking pace and the way the track is riding on the day.

Related Sandown analysis

Advertisement